Today, I personally received a letter from Anthony Hirsch at Sky Properties.
They were not very happy about my last post on the study related to links between birth defects and incinerators. They went on to question the recency of the research and have requested that I clarify some information regarding the time periods involved in the study.
My question to you Mr. Hirsch is, why do you care? For 15 months, you have point blank refused to acknowledge that what you are proposing is an incinerator. So, why should you care about the “incinerator” study at all?
I’m sure the visitors to this site are intelligent enough to make up their own minds and to assess any information themselves, but in the interest of open co-operation, we can offer you a compromise.
Admit publicly that you are proposing an “incinerator”, apologise to the residents of Salford for ever claiming it was anything other than an incinerator and I’ll make the clairifications requested. Sounds like a deal?